All change for constituency boundaries
I instinctively dislike all change. And I especially dislike changes to my constituency boundaries. There is no corner of North Wiltshire which I do not know and love; and I have represented most of it for 25 years.
However, population movements over the last ten years or so have resulted in wide variations in the number of voters in Parliamentary constituencies.
Very many MPs presently represent only 60,000 voters, some others as many as 100,000. (North Wiltshire is about 72,000.) So by law, independent Boundary Commissioners have studied every constituency, and have made proposals which will mean that (leaving aside the Western Isles, and the Isle of Wight), every MP will from the time of the next election represent between 69724 and 77062 voters.
That seems only right and proper; but it does mean some very uncomfortable changes in Constituency Boundaries.
My constituency border moves north, so that I will hope to represent places like Lechlade, Fairford, Cirencester, Kemble, Tetbury, Didmarton and so on tacked on to the north of my existing patch. To make the numbers work, I lose Royal Wootton Bassett and Calne, and a number of villages, which grieves me greatly.
Royal Wootton Bassett has been the heart (physically, politically and emotionally) of my area for the 25 years I have been your MP, and it will be a great wrench to lose it to the Chippenham constituency.
There are a number of other anomalies in the Commission’s final proposals, which I am still lobbying to get changed. There is no logic in Box and Colerne being stuck on to the top of a new constituency which comprises Melksham, Devizes and Bradford on Avon. And a bizarre line has been drawn moving the Quemerford ward of Calne into East Wiltshire with which it has little affinity. These and other minor adjustments can still be made, and I urge those who will be most affected to let their views be known to the Parliamentary Boundary Commission.
Overall, my initial thought was that Wiltshire and Gloucestershire sit uneasily together. I was reminded by some that Malmesbury and Tetbury are only a couple of miles apart yet took different sides in the English Civil War.
Those with even longer memories told me that whereas Wiltshire was in Wessex, Gloucestershire was part of the ancient Kingdom of Mercia. So they are very different in many ways. But they do of course also have a great deal in common, not least that they are located in the South Cotswolds, which is to be the name of the new seat.
Not only that but sitting in Malmesbury Abbey one day contemplating these matters, I was reminded that it was King Athelstan who first united Wessex and Mercia; and that my role would be to emulate his great diplomatic success in doing so. Its not a question of “Wiltshire taking part of Gloucestershire” nor vice-versa.
It’s a merger of two very similar places on an equal and comfortable basis. Perhaps one day I should change my name to James ‘Athelstan’ Gray.
James Gray
MP for North Wiltshire
It's a strange world
It's a strange world in which we live where we fete China despite their appalling human rights record, we engage with the Saudi regime even though they continue to bomb the Yemen, and the England football team is in Qatar to play a game of football.
And yet Russia is labelled a Pariah state as a result of its aggression towards Ukraine.
I offer no comment beyond making the point, isn't life strange.
Des Morgan
Caraway Drive
Have a view on the news? Send a letter to the editor at letters@swindonadvertiser.co.uk or letters@gazetteandherald.co.uk
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel