The case against the woman accused of killing Harry Parker through dangerous driving has been officially dropped in court.

Three charges against Ivy Mwangi were dropped after she pleaded not guilty to all three counts.

It comes a week before the second anniversary of the death of Harry Parker, 14, on November 25, 2022, while crossing Akers Way in Swindon.

At Swindon Crown Court on November 18, 2024, Ivy Mwangi appeared via video link while Harry’s parents and over 30 friends and family filled the gallery.

Charges of causing death by careless driving, causing death by driving while unlicensed and causing death by driving while uninsured were re-read to Ms Mwangi.

Ivy Mwangi arriving at  a previous court appearance (Image: Newsquest)

Having previously pleaded guilty to driving without a licence, Ms Mwangi, represented by John Simmons, now entered not guilty pleas to all three charges.

Judge Jason Taylor KC said to her: “As far as you are concerned that is the end of this matter.”

Ivy Mwangi, who wore a blue shirt and black jacket, thanked the judge and was allowed to disconnect from the video link.

The judge said to Adam and Kelly Parker, Harry’s parents: “I cannot imagine how difficult this must be for you. 

“I totally understand the emotion and frustration you must feel.

Adam and Kelly addressed concerns about the process and outcome directly to the judge.

Judge Taylor said: “I cannot comment on the process. All I can assure you is that this will have been a difficult decision, carefully considered.

“This decision will not have been taken lightly.”

A trial was due to begin on February 24, 2025, but James Tucker, prosecutor, confirmed that the CPS had decided to drop the charges, due to a lack of evidence.

They hand-delivered a letter to Harry Parker’s family and met with them in person to explain the contents.

Tim Cole, Acting Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor with CPS Wessex, said: “Our thoughts remain with the family of Harry Parker for their tragic loss.

“We keep every case under review to make sure that there is enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.

“We examined this case in great detail – including obtaining the advice of a forensic collision expert – and it has become clear that there is not enough evidence to demonstrate that this collision could reasonably have been avoided, and therefore that the driving was careless.

“We have met with Harry’s family to explain to them our decision.”

More on this to follow.

Help support trusted local news

Sign up for a digital subscription now: https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/subscribe/

As a digital subscriber, you will get:            

  • Unlimited access to the Swindon Advertiser website        
  • Advert-light access             
  • Reader rewards             
  • Full access to our app