The recent article on the opening of a new vape store in Swindon ignited a spectrum of reactions from Adver readers, reflecting broader debates about vaping, public health, and the proliferation of vape shops.

The diverse opinions expressed highlight a fundamental tension between personal choice and public health concerns.

Jay Karr said: “Vapes are more dangerous then smoking tobacco. I can’t wait till they ban these vile things.

“How about opening a shop for everyone that makes people benefit not get ill?

“Our town doesn't need any more vape shops, we need to have them shut down.”

His comments underscore a deep scepticism about vaping, reflecting fears that e-cigarettes may be as harmful, if not more so, than traditional tobacco products.

Karr’s insistence on banning vape shops aligns with a broader narrative that sees vaping as a dangerous trend, especially when targeting younger audiences.

The perception that vapes are marketed towards children is particularly troubling for many, as evidenced by Karr’s concern that such products undermine public health and benefit no one.

While some studies suggest that e-cigarettes could be less harmful than traditional smoking, particularly for those trying to quit, others warn about potential risks.

The colorful packaging and sweet flavors of many vapes have been criticized for their appeal to younger demographics, which raises concerns about their role in promoting nicotine addiction among adolescents.

Dean Kershaw-Evans offers a counterpoint: “All the people on here moaning about vapes and vaping - I suppose you're all vegans too thinking you know better than those who actually make those choices for themselves to do as they wish by smoking, vaping and eating meat. If people want to vape then let them.”

Will Thomas's proposal to ban all forms of smoking and vaping, especially around children, introduces a more radical approach to addressing public health concerns and reflects a desire for stricter regulations to protect vulnerable populations, aligning with the broader trend of advocating for stronger controls on substances that can impact health, though such measures might also spark significant debate about the balance between public safety and individual freedoms.

Paul Murphy’s reaction raises a concern about the marketing strategies employed by vape manufacturers: “Bit of a strange business, selling things that will damage people's lungs.

“Two of my teenage boys use these but would never have smoked cigarettes. The names, flavours and look of these are designed to appeal to youngsters.

“Nothing personal to [the shop owner] but I hope [vapes] get banned.”

Murphy’s hope for a ban underscores a common sentiment that, despite the potential benefits of vaping for some adults, the risks to younger individuals warrant caution.

Mark Toombs attempts to differentiate between various types of vapes, suggesting that the danger lies primarily in cheaper, brightly packaged products rather than more regulated alternatives, which suggests that quality and regulation might mitigate some of the concerns associated with vaping.

Mike Allen’s comment about the saturation of vape shops in town compared to other types of businesses, like bookmakers, reflects a concern that the high concentration of vape shops might contribute to an environment where such products are overly normalized.

Finally, Emily Louise Mayhew’s perspective as a parent downplays the fear that the presence of vape shops will directly influence her children.

She said: “I'm not worried that a vape shop is going to make my kids want to vape or smoke. Everything that's bad for us is around them, it doesn't mean they are going to do it.”

The debate surrounding the new Tidal Vape Shop on Regent Street in Swindon reflects broader societal concerns about health, regulation, and personal choice, and raises important questions about how best to balance individual liberties with community health and safety.